{"id":2072,"date":"2011-10-28T18:37:38","date_gmt":"2011-10-29T01:37:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/?p=2072"},"modified":"2017-02-28T14:46:22","modified_gmt":"2017-02-28T22:46:22","slug":"ifcomp-2011-halftime-introspection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/archives\/2072","title":{"rendered":"IFComp 2011 Halftime Introspection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At this point, I&#8217;ve written up some thoughts on half the games in the Comp. I&#8217;ve played a few more than I&#8217;ve blogged, though; my blogging has been lagging. And even though I&#8217;ve been posting rather slowly, I feel like I&#8217;ve been rushing through it. In fact, there&#8217;s no contradiction there: both things are a result of not leaving enough time for thoughtful commentary. I look at Emily Short&#8217;s write-ups and I see detailed and specific criticism of writing style, while I seem to mainly just describing the high concept for each game, then saying how I got stuck and gave up. (Getting stuck is also a symptom of haste, and giving up a symptom of impatience, so my hurried attitude shows through at every level here.)\u00a0Since I&#8217;m not taking the time to reflect on style, I&#8217;m probably accepting and forgiving bad style to an unwholesome degree, to the point where it becomes dishonest and even self-deceptive, convincing myself that the writing and moment-to-moment interaction is okay so that I won&#8217;t have to write anything about it. The discomfort caused by this dissonance may even be contributing to my hesitance to write.<\/p>\n<p>But then, would anyone be happier with more complaints? Well, perhaps. I remember reading reviews of my own game when I entered the Comp, ten years ago. I remember being disappointed whenever I read one that just summarized the premise without going into detail. It isn&#8217;t even that I wanted good reviews necessarily. I felt a brief &#8220;This rules!&#8221; as disappointing as a brief &#8220;This sucks!&#8221;, because neither said anything useful to me as an author. From this point of view, a rushed review that doesn&#8217;t gripe is a disservice even to the omitted griping&#8217;s subject.<\/p>\n<p>Not all authors feel that way, of course, and I hear there&#8217;s been counter-griping from some quarters about over-high standards and consequent discouragement. But you know something? I&#8217;m not really writing this stuff primarily for the authors. I&#8217;m not even writing primarily for people looking for games to play. My primary intended audience is the few people reading this blog who aren&#8217;t participating in the Comp in any other way. And, as they&#8217;re not going to be playing the games, I really should be going into as much detail as necessary to convey the full experience to them.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, the main thing I wanted to get out here is that if I haven&#8217;t specifically commented on the quality of prose and depth of implementation in a game, it&#8217;s probably bad. Not as bad as in the cases where I&#8217;ve commented on its badness, but bad enough that I shouldn&#8217;t be allowing myself to become as accustomed to it as I have. This will be relevant in forthcoming reviews.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At this point, I&#8217;ve written up some thoughts on half the games in the Comp. I&#8217;ve played a few more than I&#8217;ve blogged, though; my blogging has been lagging. And even though I&#8217;ve been posting rather slowly, I feel like I&#8217;ve been rushing through it. In fact, there&#8217;s no contradiction there: both things are a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[84,53,507],"class_list":["post-2072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-if","tag-if","tag-ifcomp","tag-ifcomp-2011"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2072"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2072\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2074,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2072\/revisions\/2074"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}