{"id":7321,"date":"2022-11-16T19:24:48","date_gmt":"2022-11-17T03:24:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/?p=7321"},"modified":"2023-01-20T20:07:15","modified_gmt":"2023-01-21T04:07:15","slug":"wizardry-v-the-new-spells","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/archives\/7321","title":{"rendered":"Wizardry V: The New Spells"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OK, let&#8217;s take a good hard look at the new spell names and see what they tell us about the implied magical language. We&#8217;ve got fully 29 new spells &#8212; nearly half of the list of 63, mostly for Mages rather than Priests. A couple of them &#8212; LADALTO, LABADI &#8212; are just an obvious extension of what was already there, adding the prefix LA-, as previously seen in LAHALITO, to other existing spells. (LA- just means &#8220;the effect is even stronger than you get with the prefix MA-&#8220;.) Similarly, MAMOGREF is immediately recognizable as the common intensifying prefix MA- applied to the existing protection spell MOGREF, and this is borne out by its effect.<\/p>\n<p>A few of the new names just confuse me. DESTO opens locks, but previously -TO only ended attack spells. Maybe it&#8217;s conceived as attacking the lock? I guess in a way it&#8217;s overcoming defenses? LITOFEIT is obviously connected to the previously-existing LOKTOFEIT, but LOKTOFEIT is the &#8220;teleport out of the dungeon&#8221; spell, whereas LITOFEIT is levitation. I suppose the common factor is rising up, <em>Wizardry III<\/em> notwithstanding. I&#8217;d feel a lot more comfortable about this if LOK- or LIT- appeared anywhere else. MOLITO, which does group electrical damage, seems to have been replaced with a weaker, lower-level version called MELITO. This is a pattern not seen elsewhere, and it frankly seems a little grammatically implausible to me.<\/p>\n<p>We know there&#8217;s a prefix LO- from the existence of MILWA (temporary light) and LOMILWA (permanent light). We now have a spell LOKARA that looks like it has the same prefix, but although KARA looks reasonable, it isn&#8217;t on the list. What&#8217;s more, what LOKARA does is attempt to make the earth swallow up foes (an instant-death effect to which flying creatures are immune). What would KARA do, make the earth swallow them up for a little while?<\/p>\n<p>Both Mages and Priests get a spell that conjures elementals: SOCORDI and BAMORDI, respectively. I note the root DI (life) in there, which seems fitting. -ORDI could mean elemental, in a sense like &#8220;brought to life&#8221; or &#8220;artificial life&#8221; or something, the remainder of the word indicating two different ways of going about it. And the BAM in the Priest version could shed light on BAMATU. I had wondered about that &#8212; it made it look like BAMATU should mean &#8220;opposite of MATU&#8221; when in fact it&#8217;s a stronger version of it. What if the prefix is actually BAM? We see -ATU in a couple of other new spells: BOLATU (petrify one creature) and KATU (charm NPC). This does not convince me it&#8217;s a morpheme.<\/p>\n<p>CORTU and BACORTU are an interesting pair. CORTU creates a &#8220;screen&#8221; that blocks any enemy spells cast at the party. BACORTU creates a &#8220;fizzle field&#8221; that prevents a single enemy group from casting spells, offensive or otherwise. These are both new concepts, and they&#8217;re distinct things, mechanically. But they&#8217;re hardly opposites. Maybe I&#8217;ve got entirely the wrong handle on BA-. Maybe instead of &#8220;opposite&#8221;, it means something like &#8220;counterpart&#8221;, or even &#8220;enemy&#8221;: just as DIOS is a spell you cast on your friends (to heal them) and BADIOS is a presumably similar spell you cast on your enemies (to hurt them), so too is CORTU a protective effect on your friends and BACORTU a limiting effect on your enemies.<\/p>\n<p>Mainly, though, I&#8217;m probably trying too hard to make sense of things. The new spells, for all that they try to harmonize with the legacy ones, are the product of a different designer&#8217;s mind. Who knows how much of the intent behind the names was communicated to him and how much he made up?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OK, let&#8217;s take a good hard look at the new spell names and see what they tell us about the implied magical language. We&#8217;ve got fully 29 new spells &#8212; nearly half of the list of 63, mostly for Mages rather than Priests. A couple of them &#8212; LADALTO, LABADI &#8212; are just an obvious [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[348,734],"class_list":["post-7321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-wizardry","tag-wizardry-v-heart-of-the-maelstrom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7321"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7342,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7321\/revisions\/7342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wurb.com\/stack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}